Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1924No. Civ. No. 2838PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

This is an application by petitioners for a writ of mandate directed to the respondents, requiring the dismissal for want of prosecution of a certain action now pending in the superior court of the county of Solano, No. 4529, and entitled “Antone A. Lewohl, Plaintiff, v. Southern Pacific Company, a Corporation, and John Stathakis, Defendants.’’

The record of said court concerning the cause last referred to, as presented to us, shows the following proceedings: Complaint filed March 26, 1913; answer of the defendants filed October 23, 1916, and notice of motion for leave to file supplemental…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Andersen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Rio Vista Mining Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Swim v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Harding v. MinearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Steinbauer v. BondesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Mercantile Investment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Williams v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API