Harding v. Minear
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Fifteenth District Court, in and for the City and County of San Francisco. Dwinelle, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Department No. 1, McKee, J.:
Property of the defendant was taken by a writ of attachment issued in this action at the commencement thereof, and upon the defendant giving an undertaking with sureties, as required by § 555 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the attachment was discharged and the property released.
More than four months after the commencement of the action, the defendant instituted proceedings in bankruptcy; and when he had received his certificate of discharge, he applied to the Court below in this action for leave to file a supplemental answer, setting up his discharge in bankruptcy…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wallace v. McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Medbury v. . SwanNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Hollister v. NowlenNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Bates v. TappanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Dunbar v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1813
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bank of Woodland v. HeronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Greenwood v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Wells, Fargo & Co. v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Townsend v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
- Reed & Co. v. HarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.