Legal Opinion

Adams v. State of Texas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1912No. 2451PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth District, in an appeal from Limestone County. The State sued Adams and another for penalties and had judgment. Defendants obtained writ of error on the affirmance of the judgment on their, appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brown

On the 21st day of September, 1908, a license was granted by the State of Texas to H. D. Adams to sell intoxicating liquors in quantities less than a quart, etc., for one year, at Datura in Limestone County, and on the same day Adams executed a bond in the form prescribed by law. The American Surety Company of New York signed the bond . as surety. One of the conditions of the bond is that Adams should keep “a quiet house.”

Adams pursued the business authorized until the 12th day of July, 1909, when an Act of the first .called session of the Thirty-first Legislature, known as the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Detroit Ex Rel. Watson v. Blue Ribbon Auto Drivers' Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Draper v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Eby v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Cundiff v. WillsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API