Legal Opinion
Cundiff v. Wills
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 17, 1950No. Nos. 938, 939PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CLAGETT, Associate Judge.
Under the Real Estate and Business Brokers’ License Act for the District of Columbia,1 the licenses issued to such brokers expire July 1 of each year. The brokers must be bonded in order to secure a 'license. The present appeals involve the *56liabilities of two bonding companies on defaults of a real estate broker where money was entrusted to him prior to July 1 but repayment defaults occurred after July 1 and 'during the pendency of an application for a new license which was subsequently withdrawn. From judgments in favor of the bonding companies, parties who entrusted…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Spiegler v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. State ex rel. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Coover v. CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- City of Detroit Ex Rel. Watson v. Blue Ribbon Auto Drivers' Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Adams v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Phoenix Assurance Co. of New York v. BasilDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963