Legal Opinion
In re Fil Ki
California Supreme Court
Decided August 17, 1889No. 20580PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This is an application for a discharge of the petitioners under a writ of habeas corpus. The allegations of the petition tending to show the illegality of the alleged imprisonment are as follows:—
“ That the petitioners were held by the supreme court of this state at first to be legally imprisoned, but since such holding the sheriff of said county of Yuba has placed petitioners at hard labor daily; that petitioners are held only by virtue of a warrant or judgment in contempt proceedings, and by no other warrant or judgment; that they are and each of them is daily caused to labor at hard labor…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ex parte Ah MenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Ex parte ArrasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Ex parte KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re AntazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Strattman v. StudtOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Hurley v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Matter of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- In Re SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.