Legal Opinion

American Contractors Indemnity Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 29, 2008No. 07-374 CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge.

Before the court is defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Defendant argues that plaintiff, American Contractors Indemnity Company (“ACIC”), fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) because it did not obtain prior written approval from the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) for an increase in a Surety Bond Guarantee Agreement (“Guarantee Agreement”) between plaintiff and the SBA, as required by the applicable regulation. Def.’s Mot. Dismiss (“Def.’s Mot.”) 1.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Legal Aid Society v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Akins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. American Contractors Indemnity Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  4. Lippmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. American Contractors Indemnity Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API