Legal Opinion

Seay v. City of Knoxville

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 8, 1983PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SANDERS, Judge.

The threshold question on this appeal is whether the court committed error in granting a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence when there was no showing of diligence to discover the evidence prior to an adverse judgment.

The Plaintiff-Appellee, Roy L. Seay, sued the Defendant-Appellant, City of Knoxville, for personal injuries received when he stepped into an uncovered water meter box on the city’s property. In July, 1978, the City of Knoxville leased to the Tennessee Valley Agricultural and Industrial Fair Association, for a period of 10 years, the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Monday v. MillsapsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  2. Johnson v. Woman's HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
  3. Memphis Street Railway Company v. CooperTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Moore v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Travis v. BacherigCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Collins v. Greene County BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  2. Mix v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  3. SCHAEFER BY SCHAEFER v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  4. Pryor v. Rivergate Meadows Apartment Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
  5. Rosenberg v. BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API