Legal Opinion
Chromalloy American Corp. v. Alloy Surfaces Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 22, 1973No. Civ. A. 3640PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LATCHUM, District Judge.
The matter presently before the Court is the defendants’ application for attorney fees and litigation costs of approximately $750,000 incurred in defense of this patent infringement action brought against them by the plaintiff.
Following a trial to the Court held in September, 1971, this Court held, inter alia, that the plaintiff had perpetrated a fraud on the Patent Office by making numerous misrepresentations to it during prosecution of the patent application. 339 F.Supp. 859 (D.Del.1972); 55 F.R.D. 406 (D.Del.1972). The perpetration of a fraud upon the Patent…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Monolith Portland Midwest Company, a Nevada Corporation v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Lewis Orgel and the Michie Company v. Clark Boardman Co., Ltd., and Alfred D. JahrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Talon, Inc. v. Union Slide Fastener, Inc., Union Slide Fastener, Inc. v. Talon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Chromalloy American Corp. v. Alloy Surfaces Co., Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1972
- Kaehni v. Diffraction CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Mathis v. SpearsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Codex Corp. v. Milgo Electronic Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
- Howes v. Medical Components, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Oak Materials Group, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.