Legal Opinion
Chromalloy American Corp. v. Alloy Surfaces Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 14, 1972No. Civ. A. 3640PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LATCHUM, District Judge.
In this patent suit, the plaintiff, Chromalloy American Corporation, seeks injunctive relief and an accounting for damages against the defendants, Alloy Surfaces Co., Inc. and George H. Cook, for alleged infringement of United States Patent No. 3,257,230 (“the ’230 patent”) entitled “Diffusion Coating for Metals” issued June 21,1966 to Richard P. Seelig (“Seelig”) and Richard L. Wachtell (“Wachtell”) and assigned to the plaintiff. The defendants have counterclaimed for a judgment declaring the ’230 patent invalid and unenforceable, and further that the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Egbert v. LippmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Application of Newsome W. GayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Monsanto Company v. Rohm & Haas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- J.P. Stevens & Co. v. Lex Tex Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Fmc Corporation and Vulcan Equipment Company, Ltd. v. Hennessy Industries, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Gould Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.