Legal Opinion

Nick v. Craig

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1930No. Appeals, 241 and 242PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Six of a syndicate of twenty persons, who were the equitable owners of a tract of land, each of the twenty having the same financial interest therein, filed a bill in equity for an account, against the substituted trustee, who held the legal title for the syndicate, and a land company, which had agreed to develop and sell the land for the benefit of the syndicate; the other equitable owners being made defendants, in order that all possible interests might be parties to the suit. The decree, as originally entered, awarded certain sums to each of the plaintiffs,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coffin v. LandisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
  2. Harrity v. Continental-Equitable Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Orth & Bro. v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Commonwealth, to Use v. CrowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Liacopoulos v. CoumoulisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Waldman v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Nicolella v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Randal v. Jersey Mortgage Investment Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Albert v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API