Rudy v. Lakeside Hospital
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
In her statement of claim the plaintiff relied upon an implied contract by way of bailment as a predicate for recovery. It contained no specific allegations of negligence, and it is contended that she had the right to sue either in tort for a negligent delivery, or for a breach of the bailment contract.
If this were a case of contract purely, one not involving wrongful conduct on the part of the institution’s employe, liability might attach. But this case presents a different aspect and is based upon an unauthorized and negligent delivery to an impostor.
There is a wide divergence…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Greatrex v. Evangelical Deaconess HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Helton v. Sisters of Mercy of St. Joseph's HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Waddell v. Y. W. C. A.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
- Sisters of Charity v. DuveliusOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Cullen v. SchmitOhio Supreme Court · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.