Gregory v. Transamerica Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtM. Warshawsky, J.
The issue in this case is whether, under § 3109(1) of the no-fault insurance act, 1 money received by plaintiff pursuant to a workers’ compensation redemption agreement which specifically allocated the money to past, present and future medical expenses may be deducted by defendant from no-fault wage-loss benefits otherwise due. We hold that under the circumstances of this case, defendant is not entitled to a setoff under § 3109(1).
On October 27, 1980, plaintiff was allegedly injured in an automobile collision during the course of his employment. The vehicle involved in the accident was leased…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Jarosz v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Moore v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
- Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Thacker v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gregory v. Transamerica InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Divito v. Transamerica Corp. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- McFadden v. Allstate InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Cannell v. Riverside InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Cannell v. Riverside InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.