Van Demark v. California Home Extension Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
The only questions on this appeal arise on the construction and application of provisions in a contract for the sale of land, whereby it is agreed that in the event of the purchaser becoming dissatisfied with the investment the seller shall buy back the land.
The complaint contained two causes of action, based on agreements to repurchase, under separate contracts for the sale of separate tracts, and judgment was against the defendants, appellants here. The repurchase clause in the first contract is as follows: “Art. 10. If after completion of payments the buyer should be dissatisfied with the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Zaleski v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
- Singerly v. ThayerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
- Hawkins v. GrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Tiffany v. Pacific Sewer Pipe Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- R. J. Cardinal Co. v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Coats v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Kadner v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.