Legal Opinion

State v. Hardy

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 18, 2002No. 20010396-CAPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENCH, Judge:

T1 Defendant appeals from his convictions for one misdemeanor and two felony counts of violating a protective order. We affirm.

BACKGROUND 1

12 On January 8, 1999, as a result of a domestic violence incident, Courtney Hardy obtained an ex parte protective order against Defendant. One provision of the order prohibited Defendant from "directly or indirectly contacting" Ms. Hardy. The deputy who served the protective order on Defendant explained the provisions of the protective order, including the section prohibiting direct or indirect contact, which the deputy de-seribed to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Hall v. Utah State Department of CorrectionsUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. HowellUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. BurnsUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. BoydUtah Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. SloanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  2. State v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  3. State v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
  4. State v. MezaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  5. Patole v. MarksberryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API