Legal Opinion

Patole v. Marksberry

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 12, 2014No. 20120934-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ORME, Judge:

{ 1 Sachin Patole appeals the trial court's denial of his request for a protective order against his wife, Tess Marksberry. Because we determine that the trial court erred in interpreting the Cohabitant Abuse Act (the CAA), we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND 1

T2 After having been married for about four months, Marksberry and Patole were in their garden at two o'clock in the morning when, for unexplained reasons, Patole began throwing bricks, chairs, planters, and tables. Later, during an evidentiary hearing held in connection with Patole's petition for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Bailey v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Gutierrez v. MedleyUtah Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Patole v. MarksberryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  2. Miller v. DasilvaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API