Legal Opinion

State v. Meza

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 11, 2011No. 20090684-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:

T1 Defendant Jonathan Alexander Meza appeals his jury conviction for aggravated robbery, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-6-302 (2008). He contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for a directed verdict based on its interpretation of what constituted a "dangerous weapon" under Utah Code section 76-1-601, see id. § 76-1-601(5)(b) (dangerous weapon statute). Meza also argues that the trial court plainly erred when it failed to reduce his aggravated robbery conviction to simple robbery because the State presented insufficient evidence to prove…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HolgateUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Sage v. RogersMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. IrelandUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2002
  5. Matter of SchmidtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GonzalezUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. People v. LacalloColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. IsomCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  4. State of Iowa v. Randy Allen CrawfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022
  5. State v. GonzalezUtah Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API