Legal Opinion

Bench v. Pace

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1975No. 13929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiffs initiated these proceedings seeking specific performance of an option to purchase a farm owned by the defendant in Duchesne County, State of Utah. The defendant counterclaimed and asked the court to reform the instrument entered into by the parties. The district court entered a decree reforming the instrument in question and further ruled that the plaintiffs did not exercise the option in accordance with its terms, and restored the property to the defendant and awarded a money judgment. The plaintiffs here are seeking a reversal.

During the month of September 1965,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sine v. HarperUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Naisbitt v. HodgesUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  3. E. A. Strout Western Realty Agency, Inc. v. BroderickUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Peterson v. EldredgeUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Intermountain Farmers Ass'n v. PeartUtah Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Klinger v. KightlyUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Klinger v. KightlyUtah Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API