Legal Opinion

Klinger v. Kightly

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1990No. 880003PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

This case is on appeal from the Seventh District Court, Duchesne County. The trial court found for plaintiffs and rescinded a land purchase contract based upon mutual mistake. Defendants were allowed to bring a third-party complaint against the surveyor of the property, Glen H. Calder, John Doe Wilson, and Wilson & Calder (hereinafter “Calder”), who were eventually granted a summary judgment dismissal on the basis that the statute of limitation *869had run for a claim against the surveyor of the land pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 78-12-25(2) (1987). We reverse the trial court’s…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Ron Case Roofing & Asphalt Paving, Inc. v. BlomquistUtah Supreme Court · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Warren v. Provo City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Spears v. WarrUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. O'NEAL v. Division of Family ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Sevy v. Security Title Co. of Southern UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1995

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API