Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Eldredge

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1952No. 7768PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment reforming a written real estate contract to correspond with the intentions of the parties as to a boundary line, the legal description of which plaintiff sellers alleged to be erroneous because of mutual mistake of fact. The judgment reforming the contract is affirmed, each party to bear his own costs on appeal.

In 1935, plaintiff Peterson’s mother bought a 2-story home situate in Salt Lake City on the corner of 7th Avenue and “D” Street, respectively south and west of the property, *98whose legal description called for a depth of 101 feet. In 1938 she…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sine v. HarperUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  2. George v. Fritsch Loan & Trust Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State v. DuncanMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Nordfors v. Knight Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Cram v. ReynoldsUtah Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bench v. PaceUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph v. SohmUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. MOUNTAIN STATES TEL. AND TEL. v. SohmUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Rentmeister v. DesilvaUtah Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API