Indiana Quartered Oak Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The Federal Trade Commission, after protracted hearings, resulting in a very large record, by its order restrained the petitioner from “advertising, describing, or otherwise designating or selling, or offering for sale, under the term ‘mahogany’ or ‘Philippine mahogany,’ * * * woods known under the common or trade names ‘red lauan,’ ‘white lauan,’ ‘tanguile,’ ‘narra,’ ‘apitong,’ ‘bataan,’ ‘lamao,’ ‘orion,’ ‘batang,’ ‘bagaac,’ ‘batak,’ and ‘baJaehacan,’ * * * unless such wood * * * from which products are made is derived from the trees of the mahogany or Meliacem family.”
T…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Straus v. Notaseme Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Coca Cola Co. v. Gay-Ola Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Black & Yates, Inc. v. Mahogany Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- C. Howard Hunt Pen Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Dr. W. B. Caldwell, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Masland Duraleather Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
- Federal Trade Commission v. KayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.