Legal Opinion
Masland Duraleather Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 18, 1929No. 4085PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RELLSTAB, District Judge.
The Mas-land Duraleather Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, and W. & J. Sloane, a New Jersey corporation, jointly petition this court to review and set aside an order made by the Federal Trade Commission, commanding , them to cease and desist from using the term “Duraleather” as a trade-name on imitation leather, on their stationery, in their advertisements of the product, and “from using the word leather or any other word or combination of words in such manner as to import or imply that such products are real leather.”
The respondent hereafter will be called…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Federal Trade Commission v. Curtis Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919
- Federal Trade Commission v. BalmeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Royal Baking Powder Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- C. Howard Hunt Pen Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- R. Neumann & Co. v. Overseas Shipments, Inc., Seton Leather Co. v. Overseas Shipments, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- United States v. Vulcanized Rubber & Plastics CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- H. N. Heusner & Son v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Irwin v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.