Legal Opinion
Charlin v. Allstate Insurance
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 15, 1998No. CV 98-3451 ABC (AJUx)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTION TO REMAND
COLLINS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs motion for remand was submitted for decision on May 28, 1998. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties and the case file, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to remand is DENIED.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
Plaintiff makes the following allegations relevant to the instant Motion to Remand:
Celia Charlin (“Plaintiff’) was the named insured under an automobile policy issued by Allstate Insurance Company (“Defendant”) through Donoyan Insurance Agency (“Do-noyan”). Complaint ¶ 6. Plaintiff never signed a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Samuel "Wesley" McCabe and John Elson v. General Foods Corporation, Alan Moltz, Abner Ladson and Does 1-100Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Gus Poulos and A.G.P. Marketing v. Naas Foods, Incorporated and Ranks, Hovis, McDougall Plc Group (Rhm Holdings U.S.A. Incorporated)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Smoot v. Chicago, Rock Island And Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Carl Dodd v. Fawcett Publications, Inc., a Corporation, and Mid-Continent News Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Richard J. Dodson v. Spiliada Maritime Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Emma Mercado v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Sadler v. Loomis Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Salkin v. United Services Automobile Ass'nDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Briano v. Conseco Life InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
- Meisel v. Allstate Indemnity Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.