Legal Opinion
Meisel v. Allstate Indemnity Co.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 16, 2005No. CV-F-04-6503 REC LJOPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIMS AS TO DEFENDANT ANDERSON AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND. (Docs. 7, 13)
COYLE, District Judge.
On January 10, 2005, the Court heard Defendant Allstate Indemnity Co.’s motion to dismiss and Plaintiff David Meisel’s motion to remand. Upon due consideration of the written and oral arguments of the parties and the record herein, the Court grants Allstate’s motion to dismiss the claims against Defendant Thomas J. Anderson and denies Plaintiffs motion to remand the case to state court.
I. Factual Background
Plaintiff had a homeowner’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Joe B. RITCHEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UPJOHN DRUG COMPANY; William Dement, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Samuel "Wesley" McCabe and John Elson v. General Foods Corporation, Alan Moltz, Abner Ladson and Does 1-100Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Benanav v. Healthy Paws Pet Insurance LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Fernando Infanzon v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2019
- Immigration Solutions, Inc. v. StifflerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022
- Walker v. Aetna Health and Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Walker v. Aetna Health and Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021