Legal Opinion
Briano v. Conseco Life Insurance
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 28, 2000No. EDCV 00-747 RT(CTX)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C § 1447(c) AND (2) REMANDING THE ACTION TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNAR-DINO.
TIMLIN, District Judge.
The court, the Honorable Robert J. Tim-lin, has read and considered plaintiff Albert Briano (“Plaintiff’)’s motion (the “Motion”) for remand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (“Section 1447(c)”), defendants Conseco Life Insurance Co. and Philadelphia Life Insurance Co. (“Defendant’s”)’s opposition, and Plaintiffs reply.
i.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff filed a complaint (the “Complaint”) in the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. BoyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Stephen B. Batoff, ph.d. v. State Farm Insurance Company, Leonard M. Paul, ed.dCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- MacEy v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Nasrawi v. Buck Consultants, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Rangel v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Lim v. Am. Gen. Life Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Allan Valenciano v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company et alDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2026
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.