Legal Opinion

Federated Capital Corp. v. Libby

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 2016No. Case No. 20140208PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Direct Appeal

Chief Justice Durrant,

opinion of the Court:

Introduction

¶ 1 In 2005, Appellees signed credit card agreements with Federated Capital Corporation’s predecessor-in-interest, Advanta Bahk Corporation. The agreements included a forum selection clause and choice of law provision, ensuring that Utah procedural and substantive law would govern any dispute under the contract. The agreements required Appellees to render payment to the address specified on their periodic billing statements. Each billing statement identified an address in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the place, of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Allen v. FrielUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Amy v. WatertownSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Aurora Credit Services, Inc. v. Liberty West Development, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. 1600 Barberry Lane 8 v. Cottonwood ResidentialUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  2. and 14CA1436. People v. HarrisColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Federated Capital Corporation v. DeutschCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  4. Federated Capital Corporation v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  5. Wittingham v. TNE Limited PartnershipUtah Supreme Court · 2024

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API