Legal Opinion
Elliott v. Rodeo Land & Water Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 10, 1956No. Civ. 21006PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
The complaint in this action contained three cause of action. The following facts were alleged in the first cause of action. From about the year 1929 until on or about the 12th day of October, 1950, Eodeo Land and Water Company (Eodeo) owned Lots 34 and 40 of tract 13101 in Los Angeles County, on which latter date it sold Lot 40 to plaintiffs, and on or about June 18, 1951, sold Lot 34 to John K. Keefe and Dorothy I. Keefe; lot 34 is on a hillside with a slope of approximately 60 degrees and Lot 40 adjoins and lies below Lot 34; between 1947 and 1951, in leveling the upper portion of lot 34,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Green v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Goldring v. GoldringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Whiting v. SquegliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Athens Masonic Lodge v. LeeperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hickson v. ThielmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Gilman v. NemetzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Estate of GoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Gibbons v. Los Angeles Biltmore Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Coorough v. DeLayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.