Legal Opinion

Durgin v. Kaplan

California Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1968No. L. A. No. 29470PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

This case presents the question whether a creditor suing on a written agreement guaranteeing payment of indebtedness at maturity and permitting the creditor to receive either cash or securities in settlement may exercise such choice for the first time on appeal from a judgment for defendant guarantor, after the creditor tried and lost its case in the trial court on the theory that the stock it had received in the debtor’s Chapter XI bankruptcy proceeding was worth less than the total amount of the claim.

In order to protect guarantors against being east involuntarily into the role of insurers…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Pauline v. FitzpatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. American Automobile Insurance v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Bloom v. BenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Golden Eagle Insurance v. Foremost InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. United States Ex Rel. Small Business Administration v. MorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Union Bank v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Chevron Chemical Co. v. MechamDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982
  5. Zellner v. LaskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API