Ggj, Inc v. Tuscarawas Cty. Bd. of Commrs., Unpublished Decision (5-16-2006)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Appellant GGJ, Inc. ("GGJ") appeals the decision of the Court of Common Pleas, Tuscarawas County, which granted a directed verdict in favor of Appellee Tuscarawas County Board of Commissioners, in a suit by GGJ for recovery of engineering fees on a theory of promissory estoppel. The relevant facts leading to this appeal are as follows.
{¶ 2} GGJ is an engineering firm which provides consulting and design services, including water and wastewater systems and infrastructure design, for the public sector. In early 2002, the Tuscarawas County Port Authority ("Port Authority") retained…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ohio State Board of Pharmacy v. FrantzOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Sanek v. Duracote Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
- Talley v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, & Helpers, Local No. 377Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Karnes v. Doctors HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Howell v. Dayton Power & Light Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- All Star Land Title v. Surewin Invest., Unpublished Decision (11-2-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- Miller v. Med. Mut. of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Swank v. SwankOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Crist v. Precise Boring, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.