Legal Opinion

Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC v. Harris

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 2018No. 2017 CA 00068PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wise, John, P.J.

{¶ 1} Defendants-Appellants Ronnie Harris and B & S Transport, Inc. appeal the decision of the Stark County Court of Common Pleas, which granted summary judgment against them and in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC on several counterclaims in a dispute commenced over payment for automotive tires following termination of a dealership agreement between the parties. The relevant facts leading to this appeal are as follows.

Parties' Contractual Relationships

{¶ 2} Appellant B & S Transport, Inc. is a subchapter "S" corporation primarily owned by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Benach v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bridgestone Ams. Tire Operations, L.L.C. v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. QFS Transp., L.L.C. v. Wall Street Sys., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Peirsol v. HaumschildOhio Court of Appeals · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API