McMunn v. Lehrke
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County, and from an order denying a new trial. Thomas C. Denny, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P.J.
This is an action in which plaintiffs seek to recover payments made by plaintiffs upon two contracts in writing by which plaintiffs agreed to buy and defendant agreed to sell two certain five-acre lots of land. Defendant filed a verified answer admitting the execution of the contracts referred to in the complaint and that payments had been made thereon as alleged, but denied that plaintiffs expended the sum of $30 or any other sum for improvements of said property; alleged that plaintiffs failed to make the payments stipulated to be paid, and “that more than two months elapsed after the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Boca & Loyalton R.R. v. Superior Court of Lassen Cty.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Toy v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Nicol v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by12 opinions
- Park v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Aldrich v. San Fernando Valley Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Harris v. Minnesota Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- De Recat Corp. v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Carrara v. CarraraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.