Carrara v. Carrara
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Defendant appeals from an order setting aside an order modifying a final decree of divorce.
Question Presented
Did the irregularity in substitution of plaintiff’s attorney deprive the court of jurisdiction to hear plaintiff’s motion?
Record
In a final decree of divorce, the joint custody of their minor child was awarded the parties. In May, 1952, the decree was modified to define defendant’s right of visitation. In that proceeding plaintiff was represented by Attorney Murray. August 15th, defendant mailed to the latter a notice that on August 22d he would move to modify the final decree to give…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Board of Commissioners (No. 2) v. YoungerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Livermore v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Warden v. LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- McMunn v. LehrkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Forslund v. ForslundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. BourlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- People v. BourlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Gordon v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Metrim Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.