Legal Opinion

Toy v. Haskell

California Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1900No. S.F. No. 1370PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a motion to set aside a judgment of dismissal. J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion to set aside a judgment of dismissal.

In the beginning of this case the plaintiff appeared by the attorneys whose names are signed to the complaint herein. Previous to the commencement of the action plaintiff entered into a written contract with said attorneys by which they were to have one-half of whatever might be recovered in the action as compensation for their services, said attorneys agreeing to pay the necessary costs of the case. Thereafter, without any substitution or change as to his attorneys, and without their knowledge or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Norton v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Board of Commissioners (No. 2) v. YoungerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Crescent Canal Co. v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Mott v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Wylie v. Sierra Gold Co.California Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. MerkourisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. In Re HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Shelley v. Casa De Oro, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. McMunn v. LehrkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API