Mayes v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL E. SCOTT, Chief Judge.
Convicted of brutally murdering his wife and stepdaughter, Appellant (Movant) sought Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief based on alleged incompetency of his lawyers. These claims were rejected by the motion court and, for reasons stated herein, fare no better on appeal. We affirm the judgment denying any and all relief.
Background
The underlying crimes and criminal proceedings were described at length in State v. Mayes, 63 S.W.3d 615 (Mo. banc 2001) and State ex rel. Mayes v. Wiggins, 150 S.W.3d 290 (Mo. banc 2004), from which we borrow without further attribution.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- State v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- State v. MayesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Noland v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Jennings v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- MICHAEL D. BURNS v. STATE OF MISSOURIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014