Legal Opinion

Noland v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 12, 2013No. SD 32430PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Scott, J.

Damon Noland seeks post-conviction relief (PCR) from his life sentence for forcibly raping a 10-year-old. He claims that he would and could have pleaded to ten years on a lesser charge but for misadvice from his lawyer (“Counsel”) about punishment.

“ ‘[T]he two-part Strickland v. Washington test applies to challenges to guilty pleas based on ineffective assistance of counsel.’ ” Lafler v. Cooper, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1376, 1384, 182 L.Ed.2d 398 (2012).1 As to Strickland prejudice, No-land must show a reasonable probability that but for Counsel’s error (1) Noland would have accepted the 10-year…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. DARREN S. SMITH II, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Goodwater v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. JOSEPH J. SAVICK, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. HARRY L. BROOKE, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Kurtis C. Watkins v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API