Noland v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Scott, J.
Damon Noland seeks post-conviction relief (PCR) from his life sentence for forcibly raping a 10-year-old. He claims that he would and could have pleaded to ten years on a lesser charge but for misadvice from his lawyer (“Counsel”) about punishment.
“ ‘[T]he two-part Strickland v. Washington test applies to challenges to guilty pleas based on ineffective assistance of counsel.’ ” Lafler v. Cooper, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1376, 1384, 182 L.Ed.2d 398 (2012).1 As to Strickland prejudice, No-land must show a reasonable probability that but for Counsel’s error (1) Noland would have accepted the 10-year…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- DARREN S. SMITH II, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Goodwater v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- JOSEPH J. SAVICK, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- HARRY L. BROOKE, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Kurtis C. Watkins v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023