Legal Opinion
In Re ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SECTION 4 DEADLINE LITIGATION
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 27, 2010No. Misc. No. 2010-0377PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a motion to intervene as of right or, in the alternative, for permissive intervention filed by Tejon Ranch Company, Tejon Ranchcorp, and Tejón Mountain Village, LLC (collectively “TRC”). TRC seeks to intervene in only one of the consolidated cases in this matter: Center for Biological Diversity v. Salazar, No. 10-230, which arises in part from a petition to list the Tehachapi slender salamander under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”). TRC’s motion is opposed by Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity (“CBD”)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sierra Club v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Fund for Animals, Inc. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Defenders of Wildlife v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Inc. v. McCarthyDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2015
- Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- In Re ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SECTION 4 DEADLINE LITIGATIONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.