Legal Opinion

Smith v. Russell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 16, 1937No. 43674PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

The plaintiff, Kenneth Smith, appellee, purchased a mimeograph machine from the defendant-appellant, at the agreed price of $195, payable in installments. There was a written contract entered into which is designated by appellant as a “lease agreement” which provided for the payments and which contained the following provision: “It is understood and agreed that the title to said machine shall remain in said company until final payment in full shall have been made. * * * That in default of any of said payments, said company or its agents is hereby authorized to enter on premises and take and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Thomas G. Jewett, Jr. Inc. v. Keystone Driller Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Stodghill v. C., B. & Q. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  4. Crompton v. BeachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
  5. Miller v. SteenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PierceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  2. Ginsberg v. LindelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  3. Martin Bros. Box Co. v. FritzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Grandon v. EllingsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  5. Soppe v. SoppeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API