Legal Opinion
Epter v. New York City Transit Authority
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 22, 2002No. 1:99-cv-03050PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TRAGER, District Judge.
In Epter v. New York City Transit Auth., 127 F.Supp.2d 384, 392 (E.D.N.Y.2001), this court found that the practice of defendant, New York City Transit Authority (the “TA”), of requiring an electrocardiogram (“EKG”) for all applicants over the age of forty for the Station Supervisor, Level I (“Station Supervisor”) position constituted a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (1990). The issue currently before this court is a determina tion of the appropriate remedy. At the last conference held on July…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Keith Cross and Alfred Francis v. New York City Transit Authority and Gregory Warren, Docket No. 04-2912-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Newbro v. FreedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Straker v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Gatti v. Community Action Agency of Greene County, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- Vera v. Alstom Power, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.