Legal Opinion
Straker v. Metropolitan Transit Authority
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 9, 2004No. 1:03-mj-01756PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BLOCK, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are two motions challenging the amended complaint of plaintiff Carl B. Straker (“Straker”), who principally alleges procedural improprieties arising from the handling of a mandatory drug test to which he was subjected. First, defendant New York City Transit Authority (“NYCTA”) moves “for a judgment pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), (5), and (6), and Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing the amended complaint on the ground that plaintiff has failed to allege facts which could support any federal claim or state…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Cusamano v. SobekDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Jackson v. Onondaga CountyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008
- Rusyniak v. GensiniDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
- Adams v. New York State Education DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Banks v. Correctional Services Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.