Legal Opinion

Steiner v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1968No. S.F. No. 22587PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of Disciplinary Board I of the State Bar of California that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for one year and that such suspension be stayed on conditions of probation, with actual suspension during only the first 60 days.

The recommended discipline is based upon petitioner’s alleged misappropriation of at least $242.40 belonging to a client, Emil Steiner (no relation to petitioner), and on his intentionally misleading a State Bar preliminary investigation committee considering a complaint against him.

Petitioner contends…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zitny v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frame, Administrator v. BaumanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  2. Reznik v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Millsberg v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Ashe v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Medoff v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API