Legal Opinion

Harrah v. Dyer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1913No. 22,411PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Greene Circuit Court; Charles E. Henderson, Judge. Exceptions by Fred E. Dyer, as administrator de bonis non of the estate of Frank A. Fellows, deceased, to the final report of William B. Harrah, surviving partner of the partnership composed of himself and decedent. From a judgment in favor of the exceptor, such surviving partner appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under subd. 2, §1394 Burns 1908, Acts 1901 p. 565.)

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

Appellee as administrator de bonis non of the estate of Frank A. Fellows, deceased, filed exceptions to the final report of appellant as surviving partner of the commercial firm of Harrah & Fellows of which firm appellee’s decedent was, in his lifetime, a partner. The exceptions filed were extensive, made charges of fraud and wrongdoing against appellant in closing the affairs of the partnership, demanded the addition to the account of many specific items of charge and excepted to many specific credits claimed by appellant in the report.

The issues formed on the report and exceptions were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Consaul v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Starr v. CaseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. Porter v. LongMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Sanders v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Williams v. PedersenWashington Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. MilnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Roark v. VoshellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Cunningham v. MaddenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API