Legal Opinion

United States v. Candelario-Santana

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided January 8, 2013No. Criminal No. 09-427 (JAF)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOSÉ ANTONIO FUSTÉ, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court as a pre-trial determination whether the Defendant, Alexis Candelario-Santana (“Defen*193dant” or “Candelario-Santana”),1 is mentally retarded for the purposes of Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), and the Federal Death Penalty Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3596(c).2 The court held three days of evidentiary hearings on this matter, on December 6, 7, and 21.3 Having carefully considered the parties’ arguments, the evidence before us, and the pertinent case law, this court now issues…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Ex Parte BrisenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2014
  2. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  3. United States v. SaladDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
  4. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  5. Bayan Aleksey v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2026

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API