State v. Stahl
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} James G. Stahl appeals from a decision of the Ninth District Court of Appeals that held that statements to a nurse practitioner during a medical examination at a hospital DOVE unit by a rape victim identifying the accused were nontestimonial pursuant to Crawford v. Washington (2004), 541 U.S. 36, 52, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177, and therefore admissible at trial. Upon review, we agree and affirm that judgment.
I
{¶ 2} On December 22, 2003, in an effort to help her boyfriend regain his lost employment, Ann Mazurek allegedly went to the office of his former boss, James Stahl. The next…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. James Saget, Also Known as HeshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- State v. FryOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ClintonOhio Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MuttartOhio Supreme Court · 2007
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.