Legal Opinion

State v. Crager

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 2007No. 2006-0294 and 2006-0298PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} This appeal requires us to examine issues concerning the extent that the admission into evidence of records of scientific tests (such as DNA reports) in a criminal trial implicates the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Our precedent in State v. Craig, 110 Ohio St.3d 306, 2006-Ohio-4571, 853 N.E.2d 621, strongly supports the conclusion that the DNA reports in this case are not “testimonial” as that term is defined in Crawford v. Washington (2004), 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177. Furthermore, although there is a split of authority…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. People v. GeierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. People v. RawlinsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. People v. FreycinetNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. PasqualoneOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Marshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API