Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Murillo

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 17, 2006No. 24444-0-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sv&eney, C.J.

¶1 RCW 9.94A.712 requires that a judge sentence a defendant convicted of first degree child molestation to the statutory maximum—life imprisonment. The sentencing court sets only a minimum term, within the standard range. RCW 9.94A.712. Ramon Murillo pleaded guilty to first degree child molestation. But the judge at the guilty plea hearing told him: “If you plead guilty to this charge, I will sentence you to prison and the range is 51 to 68 months. And I have to impose sentence within that range. I guess I can go low, but I cannot go above under the present law [referring to the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In Re IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. WalshWashington Supreme Court · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Personal Restraint Petition Of Shawn Benjamin SherrodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. State of Washington v. Jose Fidel MandujanoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API