Legal Opinion

State v. Dawley

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 15, 2001No. 2CA-SA 01-0078PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRAMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Real party in interest Frank Barraza is facing a second trial for the offenses of aggravated driving or actual physical control of a vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI) and aggravated driving or actual physical control of a vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .10 or greater within two hours of driving or being in actual physical control of the vehicle. At Barraza’s first trial, the respondent judge gave the following two jury instructions on the issue of “actual physical control”:

“Actual physical control” means that a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. WebbArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Atkinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. WoodruffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. State v. ZavalaArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Garcia v. SchwendimanUtah Supreme Court · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ZaragozaArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. Potter v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. State v. ZaragozaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Michael D. Logan Jr. v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API