Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Schwendiman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1982No. 17559PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

After a trial de novo, the district court affirmed the defendant’s administrative revocation of plaintiff Garcia’s driving privileges. Plaintiff appeals from the district court decision and contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the district court’s finding that he was in “actual physical control of a motor vehicle” as contemplated by the Utah implied consent statute.

At 6:00 p. m. on November 1, 1980, Officer Gerald Ecker responded to a disturbance complaint at an apartment complex in Sunset, Utah. When he arrived at the complex, Officer Ecker was met by a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  3. State, Department of Highways v. BeckeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. State v. RuonaMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State v. GhylinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. State v. ZavalaArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. Adams v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor Vehicles v. ConleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API