Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 7, 2011No. 2 CA-SA 2010-0056, 2 CA-SA 2010-0063PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 In this special action, the State of Arizona seeks relief from the rulings of the respondent judge in the underlying criminal actions against real parties in interest Daniel Oliveri and Michael Nelson in which the respondent made clear he intended to give the Revised Arizona Jury Instruction (Criminal) (“RAJI”) 28.1383(A)(1) — 1 (2008) rather than the state’s requested instruction. The state asserts the RAJI instruction misstates the law by adding an element to the crime of driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI). For the reasons stated below, we…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State Ex Rel. Romley v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. Clayton v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. MoralesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BoldingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. State of Arizona v. William Peter MoranCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. State v. DuarteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  4. City of Missoula v. J. WilliamsMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. City of Missoula v. J. WilliamsMontana Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API