Legal Opinion

Potter v. Arizona Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 24, 2002No. 1 CA-CV 02-0078PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Can a police officer have reasonable grounds to believe that an impaired motorist has actual physical control of a vehicle after that person parks to “sleep off” the effects of alcohol or drug intoxication? We answer that question affirmatively in this appeal by the Arizona Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division (“MVD”) from the superior court’s judgment reversing an administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”) decision to suspend Shelly Potter’s driver’s license for her refusal to submit to a breathalyzer test. Because the record sufficiently supports…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  2. State v. ZavalaArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. LoveArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Shaffer v. Arizona State Liquor BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. Caretto v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richard E. Lambert, Ltd. v. City of Tucson Department of ProcurementCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Richard E. Lambert, Ltd. v. City of Tucson Dept. of ProcurementCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API