Legal Opinion

Manchel v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1966No. Civ. 30082PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

Plaintiff filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief seeking a determination as to whether the card game of panguingue is one of skill or chance and, if a game of skill, an injunction against the defendants from arresting plaintiffs for playing panguingue. A trial was had before the court, judgment was entered declaring panguingue (played according to the rules established by the parties) was a game of skill and the injunction was issued against the defendants.

The matter was presented to the court on the basis of a first amended complaint as stipulated to in the joint pretrial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zeitlin v. ArneberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Orloff v. Los Angeles Turf Club, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Wilson v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. California Water & Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. TRIPLE a MACHINE SHOP, INC v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Hooper v. DeukmejianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API