Legal Opinion
Hooper v. Deukmejian
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 26, 1981No. Civ. 50576PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WHITE, P. J.
Plaintiffs and appellants appeal from the judgment dismissing their complaint which was entered after the trial court sustained the demurrer with leave to amend of defendants and respondents, and plaintiffs did not amend their complaint. The controversy in the instant case centers on the statutory scheme that was enacted by the Legislature in 1975 and 1976 which covers the treatment of marijuana offenses and offenders. (Stats. 1975, ch. 248, pp. 641-649; Stats. 1976, ch. 952, pp. 2177-2180.) This legislation provides that persons convicted of certain marijuana-related…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Otworth v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Hayter Trucking, Inc. v. Shell Western E & P, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Apartment Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Schick v. LernerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.